Tampilkan postingan dengan label NJ. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label NJ. Tampilkan semua postingan

Senin, 23 Mei 2011

Bob Dylan’s Close Encounters with New Jersey

Bob Dylan

 
By Richard A. Lee

Bob Dylan, who turns 70 on Tuesday, hails from Minnesota and rose to fame playing clubs in Greenwich Village, but he has had several interesting encounters in New Jersey during his seven decades on the planet.

When Dylan came to New York in 1961 at the age of 19, he was determined to meet his musical idol, Woody Guthrie. Since Guthrie had Huntington's Disease and was hospitalized in Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital in Morris County, young Bob found himself traveling to New Jersey to visit his hero. In addition to Greystone, Dylan spent time at the East Orange home of Bob and Sid Gleason, where Guthrie sometimes stayed on weekends.

Among the many Dylan bootleg recordings is a tape recorded at the Gleasons’ house in 1961. Known as “The East Orange Tape,” it includes a song titled “The Story of East Orange, New Jersey," which Dylan wrote after he had a dream about the city. He also referenced East Orange on his self-titled debut album, ending the song “Talkin' New York” with the lines: “So long New York. Howdy, East Orange.”

By 1963, Dylan’s career was taking off, and New Jersey once again entered the picture when a rumor began circulating that “Blowin’ In The Wind” had actually been written by a Millburn High School student named Lorre Wyatt. The rumor, which even made it into the pages of Newsweek magazine, apparently stemmed from the fact that Broadside magazine – in a practice that was not unusual for the time – printed the words and music to the song a year before Dylan recorded it.

Wyatt, who was in a local band called the Millburnaires, then played it for his fellow band members, and in attempt to impress them, falsely claimed to have authored the song. The falsehood spread when the group performed the number at high school assembly and one of the band members introduced “Blowin’ In The Wind” as a song written by one of the Millburnaires. Wyatt eventually set the record straight in a 1974 article in New Times magazine.

In 1970, when Dylan was well established as songwriter and performer, he was awarded an honorary doctorate from Princeton University. While it is not unusual for entertainers to receive honorary degrees today, Princeton’s decision to honor Dylan at its 1970 graduation ceremony was somewhat unconventional at the time. Not only did it raise eyebrows among the Ivy League crowd; it also made Dylan uncomfortable.

According to news reports about the ceremony, Dylan initially refused to wear a cap and gown and did not speak directly with any staff or students at the school. Instead, he relayed information through his wife and through singer David Crosby, who had accompanied him on the trip to Princeton. In fact, Dylan found the experience so unsettling that he wrote about it in a song on his next album. “Day of the Locusts” on Dylan’s New Morning album describes the experience of stepping onstage to receive the degree and ends with Dylan expressing relief that the event is behind him as he declares: “Sure was glad to get out of there alive.”

 Rubin "Hurricane" Carter
Five years later in 1975, Rubin "Hurricane" Carter, a boxer from Paterson became the subject of a popular Dylan song. “Hurricane" chronicled Carter’s arrest and conviction on murder charges and helped fuel efforts to have the case retried. Dylan and his entourage performed the song frequently during their Rolling Thunder Revue tour, including a December 7, 1975, show at a state prison in Clinton, N.J., and a benefit concert at Madison Square Garden the following day.

Dylan’s most recent brush with Garden State, however, may be the singer/songwriter’s most unusual experience with the state.

Nearly two years ago, while he was in New Jersey while he was touring with Willie Nelson and John Mellencamp, Dylan decided to take a walk in a Long Branch neighborhood. A local homeowner apparently did not recognize him and reported to police that an "eccentric-looking old man" was in the area. The police officer who responded also failed to recognize the singer and refused to believe his claim that he was in fact Bob Dylan – and Dylan had no identification with him to verify his identity. Even after Dylan was put into a police car and driven to the hotel where his tour was headquartered, law enforcement authorities remained incredulous until they were shown his passport.

As details of the escapade came out in the days that followed the incident, the police officer’s reaction proved to be very understandable under the circumstances. In the end, no one was hurt, no one was arrested, and the events that transpired made for an entertaining and amusing story.

Who knows? Perhaps as Dylan celebrates his 70th birthday, he will have a chuckle or two over the incident – or over one of his many other adventures in the always entertaining state of New Jersey.

# # #

Richard A. Lee is Communications Director of the Hall Institute. A former State House reporter and Deputy Communications Director for the Governor, he also teaches courses in media, politics and government at Rutgers University, where he is completing work on a Ph.D. in media studies. Read more of Rich’s columns at richleeonline and follow him on Twitter.

Senin, 09 Mei 2011

AP NewsBreak: Iowa GOP donors court NJ's Christie

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Some of Iowa's top Republican campaign contributors, unhappy with their choices in the developing presidential field, are venturing to New Jersey in hopes they can persuade first-term Gov. Chris Christie to run. The entreaty is the latest sign of dissatisfaction within the GOP over the crop of candidates competing for the chance to run against President Barack Obama in 2012.

Bruce Rastetter, an Iowa energy company executive, and a half-dozen other prominent Iowa GOP donors sought the meeting with Christie, the governor's chief political adviser, Mike DuHaime, told The Associated Press. The get-together is set for the governor's mansion in Princeton, N.J., on May 31.

The meeting speaks to what some Republicans nationally say is a lack of enthusiasm about the emerging roster of contenders. It's also unusual because candidates typically court Iowans, who get the first say in presidential nominating contests, and not the other way around.

Christie, who was elected in 2009 and has drawn national attention for his tough talk and battles with Democrats, has explicitly and repeatedly rejected the idea of running for the White House. Yet that hasn't deterred these Iowans.

Read More..

Selasa, 03 Mei 2011

Alleged Gangster NJ Lawyer Trial Set for October

Ted Sherman at the NJ Star Ledger reports that the long-awaited trial of former high-profile Newark lawyer Paul Bergrin (pic) is now set for October 11, 2011.  What follows is from Sherman's piece on Bergrin: 

Paul Bergrin, the once-prominent Newark lawyer facing charges ranging from murder-for-hire to running of high-end call girl operation, got a new trial date today after a federal appeals court reinstated racketeering charges against him.


Held without bail since his arrest, Bergrin sat impassively in blue prison scrubs and shackles as U.S. District Judge William Martini in Newark said jury selection in the case, long delayed by appeals, would start Oct. 11.

Bergrin, 55, was a former federal prosecutor turned high-profile defense attorney whose clients included entertainers like Queen Latifah and Lil’ Kim, as well as U.S. soldiers accused of war crimes in Iraq.

But in 2009, authorities charged him in a bizarre, sweeping indictment that included accusations of the attempted murder of witnesses, his alleged role in a prostitution ring, mortgage fraud and cocaine distribution.

Prosecutors said Bergrin used his law office like a mob operation. They said he sought to hire a hit man from Chicago to kill at least one witness in a Monmouth County drug case he was handling. He was also charged with conspiring to murder an FBI informant who was supposed to testify against another one of Bergrin’s clients — many of whom were drug dealers and gang members.

Several of those charged with Bergrin have quietly pleaded guilty and implicated him in court proceedings. Last August, another lawyer charged in the case, Thomas Moran, admitted he helped run Bergrin’s operation, which authorities say also involved mortgage fraud and drug-running.  And in October, Vicente Esteves, a Monmouth County cocaine trafficker, pleaded guilty as well and claimed he conspired with Bergrin to murder a witness.  Those cases were not publicized by the U.S. Attorney’s office, generating speculation Moran and Esteves may now be cooperating with the government. The U.S. Attorney’s office has declined to comment about the cases.

Last year, [Judge] Martini dismissed the racketeering charges against Bergrin.

'There is little on the face of the indictment demonstrating relatedness among the varied white-collar frauds and street crimes offered by the government,' Martini wrote, finding the charges were not the work of one coordinated enterprise.  But the U.S. Attorney’s office challenged the ruling and earlier this month, the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the racketeering charges. Bergrin’s attorney, Lawrence S. Lustberg, said he is seeking a review of the decision.
____________________________________
Simple Justice blawger, Scott H. Greenfield commented yesterday at Bad Lawyer on how it is that a federal judge can reasonably reject a plea deal as being too lenient yet remain impartial, a seeming contradiction.  Scott observed that one hoped that the Judge would also remain concerned with governmental overreach in charging a criminal defendant where the Judge found such overreach.  In US v. Bergrin, there is an example of a defendant having the full force and weight of the government come down on him, and a federal judge acting to check charges that go beyond the evidence.  Or so it seems. 

Senin, 02 Mei 2011

UPDATE: Trenton Chief of Staff Paul Sigmund arrested, charged with heroin possession; Council prez calls for his immediate resignation


TRENTON -- The city's Chief of Staff Paul Sigmund, also considered the deputy mayor, has been arrested this morning in a city alley and he has been charged with possession of heroin, according to police sources.

Sigmund, according to sources, was spotted by Trenton Police Sgt. John Breece as he was walking in the area of Stockton and Hanover streets sometime around 9 a.m. Not realizing who he was at first, the officer just noted a white male walking and seeming disoriented, sources said. Breece then went to investigate.

The suspect, later identified as Sigmund, attempted to dodge the officer by running through nearby alleyways, a source said, then he put up a struggle once Breece caught up to him.

Sigmund, sources said, was also charged with resisting arrest, and may face an assault charge as well since Breece was injured during the apprehension. The extent of his injuries is unknown at this time.

One police source said Sigmund was caught with roughly seven decks of heroin.

Trenton Police spokesman Sgt. Tom McDonough said he's waiting for official confirmation of the details before releasing any information about Sigmund's arrest. City spokesperson Lauren Ira, said she's waiting to discuss the situation with acting Police Director Joe Juniak, but that a statement should be made shortly.

Sigmund, who was a recent hire by Tony Mack, has proved controversial even prior to this arrest since coming here from California.

Last month, Sigmund was caught speeding, doing 85 m.ph. in a 50 m.ph. zone, on Route 1 in Trenton. It was later determined that Sigmund, driving a city-owned vehicle, had no New Jersey license  and his California license had been suspended due to unpaid tickets.

Council President George Muschal didn't need to wait to make a comment.

"If this is true, after it's confirmed 100 percent, and I have no doubt that it's going to be confirmed, then Mr. Paul Sigmund should resign immediately," Muschal said. "Everyone who goes into these postions should be drug tested to the fullest. Continued...



Selasa, 12 April 2011

Redistricting Revisited






Redistricting
Revisited

















By Richard A. Lee





The
immediate impact of New Jersey’s new legislative map has been to produce a
flurry of activity among members of the State Senate and Assembly.





Legislators
are retiring, moving out of their hometowns, shifting their election campaigns from
the Assembly to the Senate (and vice versa), and trying to win a game of
political musical chairs that is being played in districts that now have more
incumbents than open seats.





For
the most part, the dust will settle by April 11, the filing deadline for this
fall’s elections. But maybe we should not be so quick to relegate the
contentious issue of redistricting to the backburner for another decade. Why
not take some time now – while redistricting and all its flaws and shortcomings
are still fresh in our minds – to see how the process can be improved for the
next round of legislative map-making?





Just
think about the current system, and it will not take long to reach the
conclusion that there has to a better way.





For
example, every 10 years, once new Census figures are available, the process
begins with each of the chairs of the two major political parties appointing
five members to the State Apportionment Commission, which is charged with
drawing 40 new legislative districts to reflect the new Census numbers. That
means five Democrats and five Republicans are expected to agree on a map that
will shape New Jersey’s political landscape for the next 10 years. It is a bit
like asking the New York Yankees and the Boston Red Sox to reach a gentlemanly
agreement on which team should win the American League East.





When the inevitable occurs and
the commission finds itself deadlocked, the process calls for the Chief Justice
of the New Jersey Supreme Court to appoint an eleventh member as a tie-breaker.
As a result, the vote of one person ultimately determines whether the new map
will be more favorable to Democrats or Republicans. Continuing with the
baseball analogy, this is akin to two teams playing to a tie after nine innings
and then allowing an umpire to decide which one should be declared the winner
of the game.





In addition, under the existing
system, each of the 10 original members of the commission has a vested interest
– either directly or indirectly – in the outcome of its work. This is not a
recipe for producing a map in the best interests of New Jersey’s 8.7 million
residents. Instead, it creates the potential for gerrymandering, political
paybacks, and districts that all but guarantee incumbents will be re-elected.





And let’s not forget that, at a
time when citizens are demanding more transparency in government, state law
exempts the Apportionment Commission from New Jersey’s Open Public Meetings
Act.





Finding flaws in the current
system is easy; identifying a better way to tackle redistricting is a much
greater challenge, but here are a few suggestions to get the ball rolling on improving
the process:





·        
The
State Apportionment Commission should be restructured and made as non-political
as is reasonably possible. Take the two major political parties and their
chairs out of the process. Give a role to some of New Jersey’s ordinary
citizens – the folks the politicians always refer to when they talk about families
sitting at the kitchen table and making decisions on how to make ends
meet.  We rely on citizens for juries
that decide if people are guilty or innocent and whether they should be sent to
jail. Surely, we can entrust them with drawing a map.





·        
Tap
the expertise within our academic community. New Jersey colleges and universities
have hundreds of brilliant scholars. State government should make better use of
the experts who work in our higher education institutions. Certainly, there are
professors with the Socratic ability to determine how 40 sets of boundaries can
be fairly drawn.





·        
Put
some young people on the commission. The map will be in place for a decade, and
it should reflect the input of those who are New Jersey’s newest voters and may
have fresh ideas on politics and government.





·        
Make
better use of computers. Machines are not perfect, as anyone who has ever been
misdirected by a GPS device knows. Nevertheless, technology can do amazing
things today. Redistricting needs a human element, but computers can help build
a strong foundation for the work involved in producing a quality legislative
map.





Improving
the redistricting process will not be an easy task, but we have a decade to
work at it. But first we must decide whether we truly want to make the process
better, or if we simply want to put the existing system back into its box and
not open it again for another 10 years.





# # #









Richard
A. Lee
is Communications Director of the Hall Institute. A former State House
reporter and Deputy Communications Director for the Governor, he also teaches
courses in media, politics and government at Rutgers University,
where he is completing work on a Ph.D. in media studies. Read more of Rich’s
columns at
richleeonline
and follow him on
Twitter.